The Governance Monitor, an initiative from the Institute on Governance and Advanced Symbolics, tracks the impact of the election campaign on Canadians’ trust in government, going beyond the horse race to produce informed insights and analysis.
This is the second in a series of articles jointly produced by the Institute on Governance and Advanced Symbolics for TVO.org and iPolitics. Throughout the federal-election campaign, these articles will analyze the extent to which Canadians trust in government — and what that trust could mean for the future of our country.
The Governance Monitor focuses on what the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has identified as “strong predictors of public trust”: responsiveness, reliability, integrity, openness, and fairness.
- On Friday, after the English-language leaders’ debate, the Daily Trust Tracker stood at 58 per cent, the election-period average. It then fell four percentage points over the weekend, to 54 per cent on Sunday.
- In terms of the OECD components of government trust, responsiveness has seen the most social-media engagement throughout the campaign, followed by openness, integrity, reliability, and fairness.
- While responsiveness has seen the highest levels of engagement during the election period, it has also garnered the most negative sentiment, at 65 per cent per cent of all engagements. This negative sentiment was relatively consistent across the entire ideological spectrum of far left, left, centre, right, and far right.
Canadians are feeling positive about the integrity and fairness of our public institutions. However, it should be noted that engagement has been low.
Our journalism depends on you.
You can count on TVO to cover the stories others don’t—to fill the gaps in the ever-changing media landscape. But we can’t do this without you.
Canadians engaging on the OECD government-trust component of openness of government have a 45 per cent negative sentiment.
What it means
Canadians’ trust in government has been volatile during the campaign, ranging from a high of 64 per cent to a low of 51 per cent.
The OECD government-trust indicator of responsiveness refers to how citizens perceive the government service experience. The high negative sentiment — 65 per cent across the entire ideological spectrum — suggests that Canadians do not trust governments to deliver services reliably.
The OECD government-trust indicator of openness refers to the engagement of citizens and their access to information. The 45 per cent negative sentiment suggests Canadians believe that government institutions do not interact with them adequately when making decisions and delivering services.
Despite the sharp political rhetoric of the campaign, Canadians are feeling positive about the integrity and fairness of our public institutions. This may mean that they make the distinction between politicians and the governments they lead.
Why it matters
The new government will make many decisions, some of which Canadians will agree with and some of which they will not. A key measure of democratic legitimacy is that citizens will accept the government’s policy and program decisions even if they disagree with them. This is increasingly important in a world where polarization is growing and consensus is becoming increasingly difficult to reach.
A government’s responsiveness in delivering services and openness in engaging with citizens are key builders of trust in public institutions and thus long-term democratic legitimacy. The scores on both indicators suggest that a new government will need to make both a priority.
The data tells us that Canadians are discussing, and care about, the role of government in the delivery of services and the achievement of policy outcomes. A new government should strive for an open and transparent public service that delivers responsive and reliable services, as this is one of the most effective ways to battle the rise of extreme anti-government and anti-democratic views.