How COVID-19 has exposed the perils of for-profit seniors’ housing

OPINION: Grim conditions and fatality rates reveal the devastating mistake Ontario has made in allowing homes to be treated as financial assets for investor gain
By Martine August - Published on Jul 29, 2020
A vigil for COVID-19 victims at the Orchard Villa long-term-care home in Pickering on June 15. (Frank Gunn/CP)



In May 2020, Orchard Villa, a long-term-care home in Pickering, made headlines for a bad COVID-19 outbreak. Just two months into Ontario’s lockdown, 77 patients in the 233-bed home had died.

A report by Canada’s military revealed horrifying conditions, short staffing, and neglect. Some family members blamed for-profit ownership, arguing that COVID-19 had simply exposed, in tragic fashion, the impact of prioritizing profits in the operation of seniors’ housing.

Notably, Orchard Villa had been purchased in 2015 by private-equity firm Southbridge Capital, adding it to Canada’s growing stock of “financialized” seniors’ housing — bought by financial firms as an investment product.

This has followed the trend of what’s known as financialization in the global economy, in which finance has come to dominate in the operations of capitalism, prioritizing investor profits over social, environmental, and other goals. In seniors’ housing, financialization has arguably intensified the profit-seeking approach of private owners, with harmful outcomes for residents and workers alike.

A man filming in The Agenda studio

Our journalism depends on you.

You can count on TVO to cover the stories others don’t—to fill the gaps in the ever-changing media landscape. But we can’t do this without you.

Seniors’ housing includes both government-subsidized long-term care homes (nursing homes) and “private-pay” retirement living. Canada’s population is aging: a so-called grey wave is predicted to require 240,000 new spaces by 2046.

Industry experts call this “a rising tide that can’t be denied.” Investors are rushing to get on board, both with LTCs, where long waiting lists and government funding ensure steady income, and with retirement living — where hospitality services (housekeeping, laundry, meals) and private-pay health-care services can drive rents as high as $7,000 a month.

Financial operators have spent two decades consolidating ownership of Canadian seniors’ housing. These operators include Real Estate Investment Trusts, institutional investors, and private-equity firms.

In 1997, the first seniors’-housing REIT launched with 12 homes. What followed was a consolidation frenzy and the rise of financial firms such as Chartwell, Sienna, Revera, Extendicare, Amica, Verve, and others. By 2020, financial firms controlled about 28 per cent of seniors’ housing in Canada, including 17 per cent of LTCs and 38 per cent of retirement homes.

Ownership has also become international. Today, Canada’s biggest owners are the largest health-care REITS in the United States.

Ventas REIT and Welltower REIT entered Canada in 2007 and 2012 and have amassed major interests in 36,792 suites (225 homes). Canada has also seen a surge in U.S.-based private-equity ownership by firms that recognize similarities between our private-pay retirement sector and privatized health care south of the border.

They are eager to capitalize on the growing number of seniors on LTC waiting lists who require care and are forced into private-pay retirement living.

Why should it matter if financial firms own seniors’ housing?

Researchers have found that for-profit facilities have lower staffing levelslower quality of care, and poorer resident outcomes in both the U.S. and Canada.

Among for-profits, corporate chains are worse than independent operators.

Financialization, meanwhile, is like private ownership on steroids. In other sectors, financial firms view homes as assets for generating profit, and their large scale, sophistication, and access to capital enable them to pursue it more aggressively.

In seniors’ housing, REITs are clear about prioritizing share value, growth, and monthly investor distributions. But there are no objectives to deliver better care, dignified environments, or good workplaces, which should be paramount in the operation of seniors’ housing.

Pandemic mortality rates are highlighting the serious problems with financialization in the sector. Using data compiled by writer Nora Loreto on COVID-19 deaths in Ontario long-term-care facilities as of June 23 and my own original database on seniors’-housing ownership, I found worse fatalities in for-profit homes.

In Ontario, for-profits own 54 per cent of beds but had 73 per cent of deaths. Public homes, by contrast, include 20 per cent of beds but had only had 6 per cent of deaths. Financial operators (REITs, private equity, and institutions) had higher death rates than other for-profits, with 30 per cent of beds and 48 per cent of Ontario LTC deaths.

There were 875 deaths in Ontario’s nearly 24,000 financialized long-term-care beds, or a 3.7 per cent rate of deaths per total beds. This is 1.5 times higher than other for-profits (at 2.5 per cent) and five times higher than the rate in public homes (at 0.7 per cent).

While more detailed studies are needed to compare features of the homes and their residents, this trend appears to support what researchers suggest — that financial operators may pursue profits at the expense of nursing-home quality.

Orchard Villa was not the only private-equity-owned property to experience crisis. Southbridge Capital had outbreaks in nine of its 26 Ontario homes, and a 7.4 per cent death rate — more than 10 times that seen in public facilities.

Investors in Southbridge Care Homes are promised a yield-based investment with “upside market gain.” While those profits roll in, 176 people have lost their lives to COVID-19 in the firm’s investment properties.

These numbers underscore the need for transformative change in the seniors’-housing sector. All seniors deserve the right to affordable and safe housing, high-quality health care, and a dignified environment. Staff deserve safe, well-paying, and rewarding jobs. The pandemic has revealed the devastating mistake we’ve made in allowing homes to be treated as financial assets for investor gain.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Related tags:
Thinking of your experience with, how likely are you to recommend to a friend or colleague?
Not at all Likely
Extremely Likely

Most recent in Coronavirus